[#SmartGrid スマートグリッド] 北米:NISTがスマートグリッドセキュリティの標準化レポートを発行。重要ポイントは=>

標準化の範囲であって、どれだけ広くカバーできているかどうかです。 236ページに渡るドキュメント、読むのは大変でしたが、時間の無い人は、ページ11だけをご参照ください。  これだけを見てもスマートグリッドのセキュリティというのはITセキュリティと少し次元が異なり、複雑な世界である事が少し見えてくるのでは、と思います。 

問題は、これを全部カバーできる技術と運用方式を持っている人は誰か、ということになります。  これから業界のいろんな人とネットワーキングしながら、それを見出そうと思っています。 


NIST task group outlines security tactics for Smart Grid

The plan, key to the grid’s interoperability, is open for public comment

The cybersecurity working group developing a security architecture for the Smart Grid has released a preliminary report for public comment that outlines how security requirements will be incorporated into the design of the nation’s next-generation, power-distribution system.

“With the Smart Grid’s transformation of the electric system to a two-way flow of electricity and information, the information technology (IT) and telecommunications infrastructures have become critical to the energy-sector infrastructure,” the Smart Grid Cyber Security Coordination Task Group said in Interagency Report 7628, titled Smart Grid Cyber Security Strategy and Requirements.  “Therefore, the management and protection of systems and components of these infrastructures must also be addressed by an increasingly diverse energy sector. To achieve this requires that security be designed in at the architectural level,” the report added.

The security plan is a critical part of the Smart Grid interoperability effort being spearheaded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). It is being developed in conjunction with the Smart Grid interoperability framework, a first draft of which was released last week by NIST. The 236-page security document, which includes a comprehensive set of security requirements, is a work in process and a second draft is expected to be posted for comment in December. Annabelle Lee, senior cybersecurity strategist at NIST’s Computer Security Division, said the document is expected to be finalized by March.

The Smart Grid program was established in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which mandated that security be built into the system that would use intelligent networking and automation to better control the flow and delivery of electricity to consumers. This would require a two-way flow of electricity and information between the power plant and the end user, as well as points in between.

“History has shown that you can’t add security later” to complex systems,” said George Arnold, NIST deputy director of technical services, who is leading the effort to define Smart Grid interoperability standards. “We’re putting the security architecture and requirements up front.”

“This is very different for us,” Lee said. The Computer Security Division traditionally has been called upon to develop security standards and requirements for systems that already have been deployed.

The draft contains the overall security strategy for the Smart Grid and the products developed from this strategy. Comments on the report should be sent by Nov. 25 to csctgdraftcomments@nist.gov.

Smart Grid security requirements will be developed for specific domains, business and mission functions, and interfaces, as well as for the overall grid. But they are being developed at a high level and will not be spelled out for specific systems or components because of the impossible complexity of that job. The security requirements and architecture will address not only deliberate attacks, but errors, failures and natural disasters that also could destabilize the grid.

The security architecture being developed will identify interfaces between functional domains of the new grid, and categorize them according to the importance of their data accuracy and availability. The constraints, issues and impacts of breaches at these interfaces will be considered for each category, and security requirements will be developed.

The next steps in developing the security plan after the architecture is finalized will be to assess existing standards that could apply to security requirements, to identify gaps where adequate standards do not exist, and to assess development of new standards to address those gaps.

About the Author

William Jackson is a senior writer for GCN.

Posted via email from Ippei’s @CloudNewsCenter info database


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: